|
   
Movie
Review by David Paiz
Posted: April 2002
Critic
Score: B+
Last
time he fought against his sworn enemies....This time he will
fight with them.
"...a
really rather brilliant vomitorium of viscera, a comic book
with dreams of becoming a textbook for mad surgeons."
- Roger
Ebert
Dracula,
Nosferatu, Blacula, and Lestat...
These
names and many others have long dominated the realm of vampire
fiction and the countless films that have dealt with various
aspects of vampire lore.
Having
said that, let me now say that I have seen the future of vampire
cinema - its name is Blade (Wesley Snipes).
At
the risk of making a truly cheesy pun, Ive always been
a sucker for a good vampire flick. From Bela Lugosi to Christopher
Lee to Stuart Townsend, something about the genre has always
fascinated me.
In
recent years, efforts by film auteurs like Quentin Tarantino
and Robert Rodriguez ("From Dusk Till Dawn"), and
veteran horror/sci-fi director John Carpenter ("Vampires")
had seemingly breathed new life into a genre that had been
taken hostage by Anne Rice. As much as I love Rices
tortured characters and gothic visions, over the past two
decades there has been next to nothing new being done in the
world of vampire films.
Even
Joss Whedons wildly successful TV series "Buffy
the Vampire Slayer" (probably my biggest guilty pleasure)
often borrows heavily from Anne Rice-ean themes.
    
I
have to confess that up until very recently, especially after
seeing the Wes Craven produced flop "Dracula 2000,"
I was starting to get a bit burned out on my beloved bloodsuckers.
But
no more.
Based
on a minor character from the classic 1973 Marvel comic book,
"Tomb of Dracula" (one of my all-time faves) - the
films "Blade" and "Blade II" have given
vampire cinema a much-needed swift kick in the ass.
As
much as the first movie succeeded on many levels, "Blade
II" just tears it to shreds. Not only does it exceed
the original, it is quite possibly the best sequel of its
kind ever made.
As
is generally the case with most sequels, "Blade II"
picks up right where the first left off. After destroying
the maniacal vampire Deacon Frost (Stephen Dorff), the vampire-human
Blade sets out to find his friend and mentor Whistler (Kris
Kristofferson).
Aided
by a dope-smoking tech-head named Scud (Norman Reedus), Blade
finally tracks Whistler down and frees him from a group of
vampires that had been holding him hostage.
Just
when Blade and Whistler thought they could kick back and have
a cold one, they are ambushed by a team of stealthy, ninja-like
vampires bearing a message from Damaskinos (Tcheky Karyo)
- the ancient leader of the vampire nation.
Blade
is told that the vampires have been targeted for extinction
by the Reapers - a meaner, nastier mutant strain of vampire
immune to garlic and silver.
To
defeat this new menace, Blade agrees to join with the Bloodpack
- a hardcore vampire hit squad led by the wise-cracking Reinhardt
(Ron Perlman) and Damaskinos own daughter, the alluring
Nyssa (Leonor Varela).
Here's
what Ramses Rivera of WhiteCygnus.com had to say about the
film:
"I
thought the movie was awesome! The only thing I was disappointed
with was the fact that Donnie
Yen ("Iron Monkey," "Once
Upon A Time In China 2") didn't do much. The man is a
GREAT martial artist and unfortunitly his talents were not
present in Blade II. At times the martial arts was a bit to
fast but I thought the choreography was great. If you want
action, I highly recommend Blade II."
But
things are less than harmonious with the Bloodpack who resent
having to take orders from Blade - the guy theyve been
trained to kill. Despite this, they somehow manage to put
their grievances aside to confront the Reapers - led by the
bloodthirsty Nomak (Luke Goss).
Without
going into specifics, the mutant vampires were pretty damned
gruesome. Think of a cross between "Alien," "Predator"
and something from David Cronenbergs remake of "The
Fly" and youll get an idea of what Im talking
about.
Wesley
Snipes punctured his hand, tore cartilage in his knee and
paid a very painful price in this making of this film, and
it shows. The fight sequences, of which there are several,
are fast, furious and exceedingly well-choreographed.
After
a series of bloody, action-packed confrontations with the
Reapers, the good guys seemingly manage to defeat the blood-sucking
mutants. At this point, I was thinking that the movie was
about to end but alas, Blade finds out that he has been used
by Damaskinos and he is taken prisoner by the vampire lord.
From
here Blade discovers the shocking truth about the Reapers
and the action spins hard and fast toward a final, bone-shattering
confrontation between Blade, Nomak, and Damaskinos.
Although
he initially hesitated to take on the project, Director Guillermo
de Toro ("Mimic") did a masterful job visualizing
David S. Goyers rock-solid screenplay. On the big screen,
"Blade II" plays out like "The Matrix,"
"Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon," and "Alien:
Resurrection" as seen through the lens of an Anne Rice
acid trip.
The
overwhelming success of "Blade II" paves the way
for del Toros next big project - the long-awaited screen
version of another comic book character - "Hellboy"
and yes, a third "Blade" movie at some point in
the not too distant future.
Cool, high-tech gadgetry. Humor. Action scenes that would
make Jet Lis head spin. Gut-churning gore. "Blade
II" has something for everyone, but it is most definitely
not for children under 13.
So
what are you waiting for?!
Go!
Go see it now! Go see it yesterday! If youve seen it
already, go see it again, at any rate its gotta be better
than "Van Wilder," or "Panic Room!!"

|